CO129-259 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [5-8] — Page 455

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

ry of State's instructions. In this connection he invites

your attention to the following extract from a letter which

he received yesterday from the Chief Justice in which he a-

gain objects to serve on a Committee containing a majority

of Unofficial Members of Council.

450

7

"At the same time may I, through this letter, urged upon

Messrs. Whitehead and Chater a reconsideration of their

objections to a Committee of four viz., two unofficial

members and one official member and a Chairman. It seem

to me that a Committee so constituted would give the

unofficial members all the advantages which the origin

of the Committee could fairly be held to entitle them

to, and would be within both the letter and spirit of

the Secretary of State's instructions while at the same

time it would sufficiently meet my personal objections.

In such a Committee no recommendation could be carried

in the teeth of unofficial opposition and every recom-

mendation which a majority could agree to would be free

from the possible reproach of being a mere party conclusion. It might of course happen that on some points

there would be an equal division but the only result

would be that no recommendation could in that case be

formulated.

As Mr. Whitehead is good enough to impute to me perfect

impartiality I fail to see why he should object to a

Committee composed (excluding the Chairman) of two members on his side (for it is impossible to escape the

conclusion that there are sides) and one on the other.

Edit History

2026-05-27 03:23:46 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
ry of State's instructions. In this connection he invites your attention to the following extract from a letter which he received yesterday from the Chief Justice in which he a- gain objects to serve on a Committee containing a majority of Unofficial Members of Council. 450 7 "At the same time may I, through this letter, urged upon Messrs. Whitehead and Chater a reconsideration of their objections to a Committee of four viz., two unofficial members and one official member and a Chairman. It seem to me that a Committee so constituted would give the unofficial members all the advantages which the origin of the Committee could fairly be held to entitle them to, and would be within both the letter and spirit of the Secretary of State's instructions while at the same time it would sufficiently meet my personal objections. In such a Committee no recommendation could be carried in the teeth of unofficial opposition and every recom- mendation which a majority could agree to would be free from the possible reproach of being a mere party conclusion. It might of course happen that on some points there would be an equal division but the only result would be that no recommendation could in that case be formulated. As Mr. Whitehead is good enough to impute to me perfect impartiality I fail to see why he should object to a Committee composed (excluding the Chairman) of two members on his side (for it is impossible to escape the conclusion that there are sides) and one on the other.
Baseline (Original)
ry of State's instructions. In this connection he invites your attention to the following extract from a letter which he received yesterday from the Chief Justice in which he a- gain objects to serve on a Committee containing a majority of Unofficial Members of Council. 450 7 "At the same time may I, through this letter, urged upon them Messrs. Whiteheau and Chater a reconsideration of their objections to a Committee of four viz:, two unofficial members and one official member and a Chairman. It seem to me that a Committee so constituted would give the unofficial members all the avantages which the origin of the Committee could fairly be held to entitle to, and would be within both the letter and spirit of the Secretary of State's instructions while at the same time it would sufficiently meet my personal objections. In such a Committee no recommendation could be carried in the teeth of unofficial opposition alu every recom- mendation which a majority could agree to would be free from the possible reproach of being a mere party con- clusion. It might of course Lappen that on some points there would be an equal division but the only result would be that no recommendation could in that case be formulated. As Mr. Whitehead is good enough to impute to me perfect impartiality I fail to see why he should object to a Committee composed (excluding the Chairman) of two men- kuhionsthat(tkozót is impossi to eloipe the-son- bers onhis side (for it is impossible to escape the conclusion that there are siles ) and one on the other.
2026-05-27 03:23:46 · Baseline
View content

ry of State's instructions. In this connection he invites

your attention to the following extract from a letter which

he received yesterday from the Chief Justice in which he a-

gain objects to serve on a Committee containing a majority

of Unofficial Members of Council.

450

7

"At the same time may I, through this letter, urged upon

them

Messrs. Whiteheau and Chater a reconsideration of their

objections to a Committee of four viz:, two unofficial

members and one official member and a Chairman. It seem

to me that a Committee so constituted would give the

unofficial members all the avantages which the origin

of the Committee could fairly be held to entitle

to, and would be within both the letter and spirit of

the Secretary of State's instructions while at the same

time it would sufficiently meet my personal objections.

In such a Committee no recommendation could be carried

in the teeth of unofficial opposition alu every recom-

mendation which a majority could agree to would be free

from the possible reproach of being a mere party con- clusion. It might of course Lappen that on some points

there would be an equal division but the only result

would be that no recommendation could in that case be

formulated.

As Mr. Whitehead is good enough to impute to me perfect

impartiality I fail to see why he should object to a

Committee composed (excluding the Chairman) of two men-

kuhionsthat(tkozót is impossi to eloipe the-son-

bers onhis side (for it is impossible to escape the

conclusion that there are siles ) and one on the other.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.